How to Win The Award

The submitted file must contain:

Provide a description that does not exceed 1,000 words to submit the file. Also, attach a supporting document that consists of statistics, numbers, examples, etc.
Executive summary (250 words) summarising the main idea, methodologies, and main contributions of the submitted work.
The research paper should present a specific study on the practices of government communication in the fields of sustainability, innovation, and quality of life.
A cover letter that includes an overview of the submitted file. Provide an overview of the writer's background, accomplishments, and the significance of the work presented as part of a communication context.
Attach a detailed CV of the writer, highlighting their academic and professional background, relevant experiences in government communication, and any notable accomplishments in the field.
The full text of the research submitted for consideration shall be included. The text should clearly demonstrate the writer's professionalism, innovative contributions, and impact within the field of communications.
A copy of the research project nominated for the award must be submitted alongside a brief report on the research outlining its most important ideas and contributions to the field of communication.
Explain the research methodology used, the most significant contributions made by the research to the science and culture of communications, and the research's impact on those working in the field of communication.
Include any media coverage the work has received, such as interviews, articles, or reports in reliable media outlets.
Include any reviews, endorsements, or testimonials from experts, colleagues, or trusted sources.

Reasons that may lead to exclusion of the file

Failure to meet the required conditions: The file must meet the conditions required for the award, including that the nominated book or books must be written in Modern Standard Arabic and be related to the subject of the award.
If a submission does not adhere to the specified guidelines, including verbal limits, required attachments, or other requirements, it may be excluded from evaluation.
Lack of information provided, such as a writer's CV, summary, or necessary details concerning the work, which may render the application incomplete.
Not noting basic information about the research, such as title, author, or publisher.
If a submission lacks essential supporting documentation, such as references, or evidence of accreditation by academic institutions, it may be considered incomplete.
Submissions that raise ethical concerns, such as plagiarism, conveying false information, or lack of transparency.
Providing incorrect or misleading information regarding the nominated book or books.
The file is not clear or easy to understand and does not include the information or data necessary to evaluate the writer or author's contributions.
A submission may be excluded if it does not provide innovative perspectives, methodologies, or contributions to the field of communication.
Submitting a file of poor quality in terms of formatting or editing.
If the work submitted does not fit directly into the field of government communication or if it fails to deal with relevant topics and issues in this field.
If the submission lacks a strong methodological approach or if it fails to demonstrate a systematic and rigorous exploration of communication concepts.
If the work does not demonstrate a clear impact on government communication practices or if it fails to contribute effectively to the advancement of this field